Baker v. PJ Ohio, LLC et al

3:25-cv-00003OhsdDec 5, 2025

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
JOSHUA BAKER and TRISTAN BERGHOFF-
WAGNER, on behalf of themselves and those
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, 	Case No. 3:25-cv-3
vs.
SERAZEN, LLC, PJ OHIO, LLC, PJ LAS VEGAS,
LLC, PJ NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, DOUG PAK
and DARCIE MANGUS, 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY
(Doc. No. 27) IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
______________________________________________________________________________
For good cause shown, and to ensure all issues are adequately addressed, the Court
GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply in opposition to Defendant’s motion to
compel arbitration. Doc. No. 27.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 5, 2025 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-00003-MJN-PBS Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/05/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.