Hills of Springfield v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company

3:22-cv-00191OhsdMar 5, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
HILL APARTMENTS OF
SPRINGFIELD, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE AUTO PROPERTY
AND CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:22-cv-191
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
ORDER OF DISMISSAL:
TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the Parties that this matter has been settled,
and counsel for the parties having provided approval to enter a conditional dismissal, IT IS
ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the Parties, provided that
any of the Parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is
not consummated.
Prior to the end of the timeframe to reopen this action, the Parties shall submit a substitute
Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated. 	Parties intending to preserve this Court’s
jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of
America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment
entry. The undersigned also requires that, if the Parties intend to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction,
then they must submit to the Court a copy of the fully-executed settlement agreement (either by
filing it on the docket or emailing it to his chambers).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Thomas M. Rose_________________
Honorable Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
Case: 3:22-cv-00191-TMR-CHG Doc #: 45 Filed: 03/05/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.