3:22-cv-00191•Hills of Springfield v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Hills of Springfield v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
3:22-cv-00191OhsdMar 5, 2026
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HILL APARTMENTS OF SPRINGFIELD, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:22-cv-191 Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised by counsel for the Parties that this matter has been settled, and counsel for the parties having provided approval to enter a conditional dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the Parties, provided that any of the Parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Prior to the end of the timeframe to reopen this action, the Parties shall submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The undersigned also requires that, if the Parties intend to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction, then they must submit to the Court a copy of the fully-executed settlement agreement (either by filing it on the docket or emailing it to his chambers). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Thomas M. Rose_________________ Honorable Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge Case: 3:22-cv-00191-TMR-CHG Doc #: 45 Filed: 03/05/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.