USA v. Crawford P. Bogle et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	: 	Case No. 3:19-cr-137
Civil Case No. 3:24-cv-00104
- 	vs 	-
District Judge Michael J. Newman
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
CRAWFORD P. BOGLE,
Defendant. 	:
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM JUDGMENT
This proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for
Relief from Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(ECF No. 891). The Motion recites that the United
States does not oppose the Motion and the Magistrate Judge finds there is good cause to grant the
Motion, to wit, counsel’s showing of inadvertence in not objecting to the Supplemental Report.
Accordingly it is respectfully recommended1 that the Motion for Relief from Judgment be
granted. If Judge Newman grants the Motion, it is the Magistrate Judge’s intention to re-set the
1 Motions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) are post-judgment, requiring a report and recommendation from an assigned
Magistrate Judge.
Case: 3:19-cr-00137-MJN Doc #: 892 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

2
deadline for objections. The Magistrate Judge further finds there is no present need for the status
conference sought in the Motion.
Oxctober 8, 2026.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the
proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served with this Report
and Recommendations. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and
shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party may respond
to another party’s objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure
to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. 
Case: 3:19-cr-00137-MJN Doc #: 892 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>