2:25-cv-01473•Walker v. Winfrey
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MAURICE L. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WINFREY, Defendant. : : Case No. 2:25-cv-1473 Chief Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s January 12, 2026 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 3.) There, the Magistrate Judge performed an initial screen of Plaintiff Maurice L. Walker’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and recommended that the Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Id.) The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed.1 The Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) and DISMISSES the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). The Court further CERTIFIES that any appeal of the above-captioned action would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE this case from the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 Plaintiff filed an “Affidavit of Truth” on January 29, 2026. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff’s filing does not object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and is therefore not considered by the Court here. Case: 2:25-cv-01473-SDM-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 02/06/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.