2:25-cv-01273•Prince v. State Of Ohio
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS KELLIE J. PRINCE., : Case No. 2:25-cv-1273 Petitioner, : - vs - : District Judge James L. Graham Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz STATE OF OHIO : Respondent. : ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections were filed, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for bail (Doc. 2) and motion for a temporary continuation of bond (Doc. 3) are DENIED. The Magistrate Judge further issued two orders (Docs. 15, 17) requiring Petitioner to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Petitioner has not responded to either show cause order. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner at the Ohio Reformatory for Women. DATE: February 11, 2026 s/ James L. Graham James L. Graham United States District Judge Case: 2:25-cv-01273-JLG-KLL Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/11/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.