2:25-cv-00522•Mayhan v. Balzer et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BRANDON L. MAYHAN, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY BALZER, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 2:25-cv-522 District Judge Douglas R. Cole Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. ORDER This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff Brandon L. Mayhan’s Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #24). Plaintiff requests a 45-day extension of time to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Id. For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #24) is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) is due on or before March 12, 2026. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 2, 2026 s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr. Peter B. Silvain, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge Case: 2:25-cv-00522-DRC-PBS Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.