2:24-cv-04247•Muhammad v. The Kroger Co. et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HANEEF MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action 2:24-cv-4247 Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Submit Video Evidence of Minor Child’s Statement Before City Council (ECF No. 39). Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, because Plaintiff is not offering the video evidence in support of any identified pending motion or hearing. If Plaintiff wishes to submit the video evidence in support of a future motion or hearing, Plaintiff may renew his motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Chelsey M. Vascura CHELSEY M. VASCURA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 2:24-cv-04247-MHW-CMV Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/26/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.