Cox v. Tom et al

1:25-cv-00571OhsdNov 13, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI
WELBY THOMAS COX, JR.,
Plaintiff,
VS.
KYLE TOM, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:25-cv-571
Judge Matthew W. McFarland
ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc.10)
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 10), to whom this case is referred pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time
for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said
Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. This matter is hereby TERMINATED from the
Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
By: ~W.-.}{-~
JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND
Case: 1:25-cv-00571-MWM-KLL Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/13/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.