Franklin v. Talbert House Crisis et al

1:25-cv-00088OhsdOct 8, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
QUEEN CHARLOTTE FRANKLIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
TALBERT HOUSE CRISIS, et al.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:25-cv-88
Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) issued
by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on February 25, 2025. No objections have
been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired.
Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983
amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g.,
Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio
Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice for
failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff is WARNED that she
is highly likely to be deemed vexatious and made subject to prefiling limitations if she persists
in filing additional cases that lack any reasonable basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction
and/or that are factually and legally frivolous under screening standards.
Case: 1:25-cv-00088-JPH-SKB Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation and pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would lack an arguable basis in
law or in fact and thus would not be taken in good faith. The Court accordingly DENIES
Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5),
Plaintiff remains free to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 8, 2026
Jeffery P. Hopkins
United States District Judge
Case: 1:25-cv-00088-JPH-SKB Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.