1:24-cv-00145•Goodykoontz v. State Of Ohio
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION David Goodykoontz, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24cv145 State of Ohio, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 3, 2025 (Doc. 52). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 52) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 52) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 38) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 29) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court Case: 1:24-cv-00145-MRB-KLL Doc #: 55 Filed: 12/01/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.