Goodykoontz v. State Of Ohio

1:24-cv-00145OhsdDec 1, 2025

Full text

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
David Goodykoontz,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 	1:24cv145
State of Ohio,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed
by the Magistrate Judge on November 3, 2025 (Doc. 52).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file
objections to the R&R in a timely manner. 	United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th
Cir. 1981). 	No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 52) have been filed
and the time to do so has expired.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 52) of the Magistrate Judge is
hereby ADOPTED. 	Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 38) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment (Doc. 29) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett, Judge
United States District Court
Case: 1:24-cv-00145-MRB-KLL Doc #: 55 Filed: 12/01/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.