Thompson v. Warden Leunike et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
ALLAN THOMPSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WARDEN LEUNIKE, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:23-cv-642
Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) issued
by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on August 5, 2025. The Magistrate Judge
recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) be granted. No
objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)
has expired.
Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983
amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g.,
Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio
Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is
GRANTED. The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the docket.
Case: 1:23-cv-00642-JPH-SKB Doc #: 27 Filed: 12/10/25 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 10, 2025
Jeffery P. Hopkins
United States District Judge
~ 	e¢;. ;_, .
Case: 1:23-cv-00642-JPH-SKB Doc #: 27 Filed: 12/10/25 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>