1:23-cv-00581•Murphy v. Black
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ALLEN MURPHY, ) CASE NO.: 1:23-cv-00581 ) Petitioner, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) v. ) ) WARDEN KENNETH BLACK ) ORDER ) ) Respondent. ) This matter came before the Court on Petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”) (Doc. 1). This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss the Petition. Doc. 12. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Petitioner did not file an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Petition is DISMISSED. Case: 1:23-cv-00581-JRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/15/25 1 of 2. PageID #: <pageID>
2 The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 12, 2025 /s/ Judge John R. Adams Date JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 1:23-cv-00581-JRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/15/25 2 of 2. PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.