1:25-cr-00174•USA v. Burgess
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DECISION AND ORDER v. 25-CR-174-A CHAD BURGESS, Defendant. This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On December 16, 2025, Defendant Chad Burgess appeared before Magistrate Judge McCarthy, waived his right to indictment (Dkt. No. 22) and entered a plea of guilty to a one-count Information (Dkt. No. 23), which charges him with one count of possession with intent to distribute 5 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), pursuant to a written plea agreement. (Dkt. No. 24). Magistrate Judge McCarthy issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 25) confirming his oral findings that Defendant’s plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis. No timely objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. It is hereby ORDERED that, upon review of the waiver of indictment (Dkt. No. 22), the information (Dkt. No. 23), the plea agreement (Dkt. No. 24), and the plea transcript (Dkt. No. 31) of the December 16, 2025, change-of-plea proceeding before the Magistrate Judge; and the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that all the requirements Case 1:25-cr-00174-RJA-JJM Document 32 Filed 01/12/26 Page 1 of 2
2 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 11 have been carefully followed. Defendant’s waiver of his right to indictment together with his plea of guilty were knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis. The Magistrate Judge informed Defendant, who was placed under oath and addressed personally in open court, of Defendant’s rights and the trial rights he was waiving should the Court accept his plea of guilty, the nature of the charge to which he was pleading guilty, and any maximum possible penalty, among the other requirements listed in the Rule. The Magistrate Judge determined that Defendant understood the foregoing. Accordingly, Defendant’s plea of guilty is accepted based upon the oral findings of the Magistrate Judge as confirmed in the written Report and Recommendation. Sentencing is scheduled for May 18, 2026 at 11:30 am. The parties are directed to the Court’s forthcoming Text Order for the submission of sentencing documents. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Richard J. Arcara_______ HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: January 12, 2026 Buffalo, New York Case 1:25-cr-00174-RJA-JJM Document 32 Filed 01/12/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.