Tomas Burgos, Jr.

Page 1 of 14
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------- X
In re Tomas Burgos, Jr., 	Chapter 13
Case No. 12-36302
Debtor.
---------------------------------------------------- X
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DISMISSING DEBTOR’S CHAPTER 13 CASE
A P P E A R A N C E S :
Jeffrey L. Sapir-13
As Chapter 13 and 12 Trustee
399 Knollwood Road
Suite 102
White Plains, NY 10603
Chapter 13 Trustee
Tomas Burgos, Jr.
308 Parr Meadow Drive
PO Box 2523
Newburgh, NY 12550
Debtor, pro se
HON. CECELIA G. MORRIS
CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE, SDNY
The Court considers the Chapter 13 Trustee’s (the “Trustee”) motion to
dismiss the bankruptcy case of the pro se debtor, Tomas Burgos, Jr. (“Debtor”).
The Court grants the Trustee’s motion because the Debtor failed to timely file the
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 1 of 14

Page 2 of 14
schedules, disclosures and other information required by 11 U.S.C §§ 521 and
1307 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1007, failed to attend his meeting
of creditors required by 11 U.S.C § 341, and failed to attend the hearing on the
Trustee’s motion to dismiss that was held on July 24, 2012, among other reasons as
set forth herein.
Jurisdiction
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a),
28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and the Amended Standing Order of Reference signed by Chief
Judge Loretta A. Preska dated January 31, 2012. This is a “core proceeding” under
28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) (matters concerning the administration of the estate).
Background
The Debtor filed a petition for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code on May 21, 2012.1 ECF No. 1. With his petition, the Debtor filed a certificate
of credit counseling, and an application to pay the $281 filing fee in installments.
ECF Nos. 3, 4. The Court entered an order granting Debtor’s application to pay in
installments. ECF No. 5. Debtor made one installment payment of $80 on May 22,
2012. Receipt No. 32776.
Debtor did not file any schedules, statement of financial affairs, or any other
required supporting documents with his petition. A deficiency notice was mailed to
1 Title 11 of the United States Code, §§ 101 et seq., hereafter referred to as the “Bankruptcy
Code.”
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 2 of 14

Page 3 of 14
the Debtor on May 23, 2012, listing the outstanding documents and alerting the
Debtor that failure to file the documents by June 4, 2012, could result in dismissal
of his bankruptcy case. See ECF No. 6. The outstanding documents included a
statement of current monthly income and calculation of commitment period and
disposable income due, chapter 13 model plan, schedules A through J, and a
summary of schedules. Id.
The Debtor failed to file any of the outstanding documents by the June 4
deadline. On June 6, 2012 the Debtor filed a motion for a 30-day extension (to July
14, 2012) to submit the outstanding documents. ECF No. 10. He claimed in the
motion to be “waiting on copies of important documents that must be included for
my 521(a) documents that may or may not affect said case.” Id. On June 21, 2012
the Trustee filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to several Bankruptcy Code sections,
including for failure to appear at the meeting of creditors, failure to file schedules
and a plan, and failure to provide copies of tax returns and pay stubs. See ECF No.
11.
On July 11, 2012 the Debtor filed a document entitled “Letter RE: Power of
Attorney”, which included an incoherent letter to the Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration indicating that the Debtor was repudiating, nunc pro tunc,
a “power of attorney Consent,” which allegedly was attached to his Social Security
number, effective to the date the account was opened. See ECF No. 12. Also
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 3 of 14

Page 4 of 14
included in the filing was a UCC 1 Financing Statement, which states that the
Debtor is a “living soul” and that he thereby “secures all rights, all interests and
title” in the Debtor’s birth certificate. Id. The UCC statement also purports to
secure “the pledge represented” by the Debtor’s birth certificate, including “the
pinus hypotheca, herediments, res, the energy and all products derived therefrom,
including…the name TOMAS BURGOS JR.” Id.
It is noted that the July 11 filing included a direction to the Clerk of the
Court to file the documents and return to the Debtor a certified copy
acknowledging the filing, or in the alternative evidence of the Clerk’s “Article VI
Oath of Fidelity as well as the policy number and name and address of the
Underwriter of your Bond.” Id. These filings do not satisfy the financial
disclosures that are required by the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
On July 13, 2012, the Debtor filed with the Court a copy of his birth
certificate, along with a letter stating that the birth certificate was a “bond” which
he was “pledging for liquidation and to settle, set-off and close all debt accounts,
both public and private.”
The Trustee filed a motion to dismiss on June 21, 2012 (the “Motion”). The
Motion lists the various Bankruptcy Code sections that the Debtor allegedly failed
to comply with. The Trustee seeks dismissal of the Debtor’s case pursuant to:
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 4 of 14

Page 5 of 14
• 	Bankruptcy Code § 1307(c)(1) for unreasonable delay which prejudiced the
creditors;
• 	Bankruptcy Code § 1307(c)(3) for failure to file a plan;
• 	Bankruptcy Code § 1307(c)(4) for failure to make payments to the Trustee;
• 	Bankruptcy Code § 521(i) for failure to file a list of creditors, schedules,
statement of financial affairs, copies of payments within 60 days of filing,
and statements showing net income and anticipated changes in income;
• 	Bankruptcy Code § 521(e)(2)(A)(i) for failure to submit a copy of Federal
income tax return;
• 	Bankruptcy Rule 3015(b) for failure to file a plan within 14 days of the
initial petition filing, or to timely file a request to extend; and
• 	11 U.S.C. § 341(a) for failure to appear at a meeting of creditors.
Ruling
There exists in this case a plethora of reasons to dismiss pursuant to the
many Bankruptcy Code sections listed by the Trustee, any one of which alone
would be sufficient to dismiss. The 45-day deadline set out in Bankruptcy Code §
521(i) expired on July 5, 2012. The extended deadline requested by the Debtor, of
July 14, 2012, passed without the filing of the schedules and other necessary
documents. This Court was prepared to make an inquiry as to the nature of the
delay in obtaining the proper information and attending the meeting of the
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 5 of 14

Page 6 of 14
creditors, but was unable due to the Debtor’s failure to attend the scheduled
hearing on the Motion on July 24, 2012.
Rules and Legal Standards
I. 	Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss
A. § 1307(c)(1)—unreasonable delay
Section 1307(c)(1) states that in a chapter 13 case “unreasonable delay by
the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors” is grounds for conversion to chapter 7 or
dismissal. 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1). “The powers bestowed upon the court in §
105(a) include the equitable and discretionary power to dismiss a case under §
1307(c).” Howard v. Lexington Invs., 284 F.3d 320, 323 (1st Cir. 2002). Courts
have found ‘unreasonable delay’ where a debtor failed to timely file her state tax
returns, id., failed to make payments under the plan, failed to disclose ownership of
assets on schedules, and “fail[ed] to make good faith payments to the Chapter 13
Trustee.” In re Blaise, 219 B.R. 946, 950-51 (B.A.P. 2d Cir. 1998). Where a
further delay by the debtor “would only prejudice creditors and [make] the
feasibility of any plan unlikely” conversion or dismissal is proper. Howard, 284
F.3d at 323 (citing In re Gonzalez, 99 B.R. 188, 191 (Bankr. D.P.R. 1989)). A
court’s “consideration whether to dismiss or convert under § 1307(c) requires the
court further to determine whether the best interests of the estate and its creditors
dictate conversion or dismissal.” In re Blaise, 219 B.R. at 950.
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 6 of 14

Page 7 of 14
Just as in Howard v. Lexington Invs., the Debtor in this case has failed to file
his tax returns with the Trustee. This Debtor has also failed to make payments to
the Trustee, similar to the debtor in In re Blaise. An analysis of whether dismissal
or conversion would better benefit creditors is difficult, if not impossible, due to
the Debtor’s failure to file a list of creditors. Therefore, dismissal is proper under §
1307(c)(1).
B. §1307(c)(3)—failure to timely file a plan
Section 1307(c)(3) provides for conversion to chapter 7, or dismissal, of a
chapter 13 case where the debtor “[failed] to file a plan timely.” 11 U.S.C. §
1307(c)(3). A bankruptcy court’s decision whether to dismiss for failure to file a
plan is discretionary, and “if the bankruptcy court’s conclusion supporting
dismissal are supported by the facts, there is no abusive discretion.” In re Dudley,
273 B.R. 197, 199 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2002). Failure to file a plan combined with
failure to file other required financial documents “constitutes unreasonable delay
by the debtor, and is cause for dismissal of the case.” In re Martin-Trigona, 35
B.R. 596, 601 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983) (where the debtor failed to file his plan or
schedule of assets and liabilities in the four months since his case was filed, though
he did file a list of creditors).
In this case the Debtor has not filed any of the required documents, except
for his initial petition, in the two months his case has been open. This Debtor has
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 7 of 14

Page 8 of 14
filed even less required paperwork than the debtor in In re Martin-Trigona, who
did file a list of creditors. This Debtor’s failure to file a plan, combined with his
failure to file any other required documents, amounts to “unreasonable delay” as
defined in In re Martin-Trigona and is grounds for dismissal. Therefore, dismissal
is proper under § 1307(c)(3).
C. §1307(c)(4)—timely payments to the trustee
Section 1307(c)(4) provides for conversion to chapter 7, or dismissal, of a
chapter 13 case where the debtor failed “to commence making timely payments
under § 1326 of this title.” 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(4), In re Miller, Nos. 08 Civ.
4305(JGK), 08 Civ. 4306(JGK), 2009 WL 174902, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. January 26,
2009) (affirming a bankruptcy court dismissal on several grounds, including the
debtor’s failure “to remit timely payments to the Chapter 13 trustee.”). Section
1326 provides that a “debtor shall commence making payments not later than 30
days after the date of the filing of the plan or the order for relief, whichever is
earlier.” 11 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1).
In this case, the Debtor has not proposed a chapter 13 plan, or made any
payments to the Trustee. Either one of these failures, under § 1307, may be cause
for dismissal on its own. “Where there exists a multiplicity of factors which would
be sufficient to meet the cause requirement of § 1307, the cumulative effect will be
considered in determining whether there exists sufficient cause for a dismissal with
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 8 of 14

Page 9 of 14
prejudice.” Martin-Trigona, 35 B.R. at 601. Therefore, dismissal is proper under §
1307(c)(4).
D. § 521(i)—timely filing of documents required by § 521(a)
Section 521(i) provides that if a chapter 13 debtor “fails to file all of the
information required under subsection (a)(1) within 45 days after the date of filing
of the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day
after the date of the filing of the petition.” 11 U.S.C. § 521(i)(1). The information
required by subsection (a)(1) includes, among other things, a list of creditors,
schedule of assets and liabilities, schedule of current income and expenditures, and
a statement of the debtor’s financial affairs. The order of dismissal shall be entered
“not later than 7 days after” an interested party moves the court for such dismissal.
11 U.S.C. § 521(i)(2). In In re Christensen, No. 12–10042, 2012 WL 1252593,
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. April 13, 2012), the debtor failed to submit a credit counseling
certificate and Schedules A through J. The bankruptcy judge concluded that in
such a case “there is more than sufficient basis to dismiss the Debtor’s bankruptcy
case.” Id. at *2 (the court ultimately transferred venue on other grounds rather than
dismiss). This Court has found, in dicta, that Congress intended the automatic
dismissal in the statute to be truly automatic at the expiration of 46 days, and that
any other interpretation would give no effect to the language. In re Tay-Kwamya,
367 B.R. 422, 425 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007) (rebutting the argument that § 521(i)(2)
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 9 of 14

Page 10 of 14
requires a motion made and a court order entered to dismiss a case under this
section).
For the reasons stated by the court in In re Christensen, the Court grants the
Trustee’s Motion. In the case at bar, Debtor has failed to file all the documents
required under § 521(a)(1). The 45-day deadline to file the information, set by §
521(i)(1) expired on July 5, 2012; the 46th day from the date of filing was July 6,
2012. The information required by the Bankruptcy Code has not been filed.
Therefore, dismissal is proper under § 521(i).
E. § 521(e)(2)(A)(i)—providing federal income tax returns to the
trustee
Section 521(e)(2)(A)(i) provides that within seven days before the meeting
of the creditors, the debtor shall provide the trustee with the federal income tax
return from the most recent year. 11 U.S.C. § 521(e)(2)(A)(i). If the debtor fails to
provide the tax return the case shall be dismissed “unless the debtor demonstrates
that the failure to so comply is due to circumstances beyond the control of the
debtor.” 11 U.S.C. § 521(E)(2)(B).
In this case the Debtor did not provide his tax returns to the Trustee prior to
a meeting of the creditors (no such meeting was held). The tax returns are still
outstanding. Pursuant to § 521(e)( 2)(A)(i) this is grounds for dismissal, and is not
discretionary upon the Court. The Debtor has not made any indication that he
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 10 of 14

Page 11 of 14
would meet any exception to dismissal provided for in § 521(E)(2)(B). Therefore,
dismissal is proper under § 521(e)(2)(A)(i).
F. Bankruptcy Rule 3015(b)—chapter 13 plan
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3015(b) provides that if a chapter 13
plan “is not filed with the petition, it shall be filed within 14 days thereafter, and
such time may not be further extended except for cause.” Fed. R. Bankr. P.
3015(b). The objective of this rule is to help ensure that the case moves along
quickly and efficiently. In re Pearson, 773 F.2d 751, 757 (6th Cir. Mich. 1985)
(commenting that a case should not get hung up on a jurisdictional question to the
detriment of the case’s efficient advancement). If more than 14 days are needed, a
debtor may move for an extension under Rule 9013. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9013.
Whether or not to dismiss a case for failure to timely file a plan is discretionary
upon the court. In re Greene, 127 B.R. 805, 806 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1991).
In this case the Debtor did not file a plan within fourteen days, and still has
not. Debtor has made no motion for an extension under this section of the
Bankruptcy Code. Additionally, Debtor has made no showing of cause as to why
he should be granted extra time. Therefore, dismissal is proper under Bankruptcy
Rule 3015(b).
G. § 341(a)—meeting of the creditors
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 11 of 14

Page 12 of 14
Section 341(a) provides that “[w]ithin a reasonable time after the order for
relief in a case under this title, the United States trustee shall convene and preside
at a meeting of creditors.” 11 U.S.C. § 341(a). “The failure of a debtor to appear at
this meeting constitutes grounds for dismissal.” Matter of Daylight Transport, Inc.,
42 B.R. 20, 27 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1984). Where a “debtor fails to appear at the §
341(a) meeting as ordered, the estate and its creditors will be hindered and the
bankruptcy process will be frustrated. Hence, a debtor’s failure to attend a § 341(a)
meeting without justification amounts to a failure to abide by an order of the
court.” In re Pappalardo, 109 B.R. 622, 625 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990).
In this case, according to the Trustee’s motion, the Debtor failed to attend
the § 341(a) meeting of creditors. The Debtor has offered no response or
justification. According to the holding in In re Pappalardo and Matter of Daylight
Transport, dismissal is proper.
II. 	Debtor’s Motion to Extend Deadline
Debtor filed a motion to extend the time allowed to submit the necessary
documents by 30 days because he was “waiting on copies of important documents”
for inclusion in his submission. In the motion Debtor referred to Bankruptcy Code
§ 521(a)(1) as the list of documents that he was waiting on. This section includes: a
list of creditors; schedule of assets and liabilities; schedule of current income and
expenses; statement of financial affairs; and federal income tax return. Waiting on
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 12 of 14

Page 13 of 14
the 521(a)(1) documents does not explain Debtor’s failure to attend the 341(a)
meeting of the creditors or his failure to file a plan under Rule 3015(b).
Section 521(i) provides that a debtor’s case is automatically dismissed if the
necessary documents are not filed “within 45 days after the date of the filing of the
petition.” 11 U.S.C. § 521(i). This Bankruptcy Code section is discussed at length
in section (I)(D) of this opinion.
In this case it appears that the Debtor intended to seek an extension of the
time provided to file the information pursuant to § 521(i)(3), which allows a debtor
to request extra time to submit the necessary documents, not exceeding 45 days. 11
U.S.C. § 521(i)(3). Though the Debtor only refers to the § 521(a)(1) documents in
his motion, this Court understood the motion to encompass all missing documents
as part of the leeway afforded pro ses. While the filing of this motion was two days
late, flexibility was given due to the Debtor’s lack of legal knowledge and
experience. No documents have been forthcoming, and the deadlines to file them
have passed—including the requested extension date of July 14, 2012. Therefore,
dismissal is proper under § 521(i).
Conclusion
For all the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Trustee’s motion to
dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 521(e) and (i), 1307(c)(1), (3) and (4), and
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 13 of 14

Page 14 of 14
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3015(b). The Bankruptcy Code and Rules
require a chapter 13 debtor to file financial disclosures, a plan, and other
information within set deadlines. The Debtor failed to meet any of these
obligations, and did not appear at the meeting of creditors or the hearing on the
Trustee’s motion to dismiss. Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Trustee’s Motion is GRANTED, and the present
bankruptcy case is DISMISSED. The Trustee shall submit an order.
Dated: August 3, 2012
Poughkeepsie, New York
/s/ Cecelia G. Morris
Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge
12-36302-cgm Doc 15 Filed 08/03/12 Entered 08/03/12 11:36:58 Main Document
Pg 14 of 14