1:11-ap-02800•SIGNATURE APPAREL GROUP LLC v. Studio IP Holdings LLC et al
Full text
1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- x In re: SIGNATURE APPAREL GROUP LLC, Debtor : : : : : : Chapter 11 Case No. 09-15378 (RG) --------------------------------------------------------------- x SIGNATURE APPAREL GROUP LLC, Plaintiff v. JOSEPH LAURITA; CHRISTOPHER LAURITA; NEW STAR GROUP, LLC; ROC FASHIONS LLC; RVC ENTERPRISES, LLC; RUBEN AZRAK, VICTOR AZRAK, CHARLES AZRAK, ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC., and STUDIO IP HOLDINGS LLC, Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Adversary No. 11-02800 (RG) --------------------------------------------------------------- x ROC FASHIONS LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff v. STUDIO IP HOLDINGS LLC, Third-Party Defendant : : : : : : : : : : --------------------------------------------------------------- x ORDER (A) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND (B) DENYING THE DEFENDANTS’ DAUBERT MOTION Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiff Signature Apparel Group LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 142); (2) Defendant Iconix Brand Group, Inc.’s and 11-02800-rg Doc 187 Filed 03/04/15 Entered 03/04/15 14:52:38 Main Document Pg 1 of 2
2 Defendant Studio IP Holdings LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 140); and (3) Defendant Iconix Brand Group, Inc.’s and Defendant Studio IP Holdings LLC’s Daubert Motion (ECF No. 141) (the “Daubert Motion”). On March 4, 2015, the Court entered its Memorandum Opinion (A) Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and (B) Denying the Defendants’ Daubert Motion (the “Opinion”). For the reasons set forth in the Opinion, it is hereby: ORDERED that summary judgment is GRANTED to the Defendants as to Counts V and VIII of the Amended Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that Counts V and VIII of the Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that summary judgment is DENIED as to Counts VI and VII of the Amended Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as to Counts I, II, III, IV, and IX of the Amended Complaint, as fully set forth in the Opinion; and it is further ORDERED that the Daubert Motion is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that trial in the above-captioned adversary proceeding shall commence on April 21, 2015. Dated: New York, New York March 4, 2015 s/ Robert E. Grossman Honorable Robert E. Grossman United States Bankruptcy Judge 11-02800-rg Doc 187 Filed 03/04/15 Entered 03/04/15 14:52:38 Main Document Pg 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.