6:24-cv-00920•Nowicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH N., Plaintiff, - v - 6:24-CV-920 (DJS) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JOSEPH N. Plaintiff Pro Se Rome, New York 13440 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION VERNON NORWOOD, ESQ. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Attorney for Defendant 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 ORDER Presently pending is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this matter. Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff’s response was due on February 2, 2026. Dkt. No. 28. Plaintiff, however, has not responded to the Motion. In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to respond to Defendants’ Motion to February 27, 2026. Plaintiff is advised that Defendant’s Motion seeks dismissal of his Complaint. If the Motion to Dismiss is granted, the Complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Motion and justify his failure to prosecute this matter may be viewed as an additional basis on which to grant the Motion. WHEREFORE, after due consideration, it is hereby Case 6:24-cv-00920-DJS Document 30 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 2
2 ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall file and serve any opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on or before February 27, 2026; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2026 Albany, New York Case 6:24-cv-00920-DJS Document 30 Filed 02/03/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.