5:25-cv-01199•Paul v. Carden, Dotzler, Hammond Law, PLLC Law Firm et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE PRINELL PAUL Plaintiff(s) vs. CASE NUMBER: 5:25-cv-1199 (GTS/MJK) CARDEN, DOTZLER, HAMMOND LAW, PLLC LAW FIRM, CLIFFORD CARDEN, Attorney at Law; MATTHEW DOTZLER, Attorney at Law; DAVID HAMMOND, Attorney at Law; BRIAN TEDD, Attorney at Law; and NICHOLAS HURTADO, Attorney at Law Defendant(s) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Katz’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Glenn T. Suddaby, dated April 7, 2026. DATED: April 7, 2026 s/ Abbigail Selnick Deputy Clerk Case 5:25-cv-01199-GTS-MJK Document 9 Filed 04/07/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.