Paul v. Carden, Dotzler, Hammond Law, PLLC Law Firm et al

5:25-cv-01199NyndApr 7, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
PRINELL PAUL
Plaintiff(s)
vs. 	CASE NUMBER: 5:25-cv-1199 (GTS/MJK)
CARDEN, DOTZLER, HAMMOND LAW, PLLC LAW FIRM,
CLIFFORD CARDEN, Attorney at Law;
MATTHEW DOTZLER, Attorney at Law; DAVID
HAMMOND, Attorney at Law; BRIAN TEDD, Attorney
at Law; and NICHOLAS HURTADO, Attorney at Law
Defendant(s)
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or
heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Katz’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.
All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Glenn T. Suddaby, dated April 7, 2026.
DATED: April 7, 2026
s/
Abbigail Selnick
Deputy Clerk
Case 5:25-cv-01199-GTS-MJK Document 9 Filed 04/07/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.