1:22-cv-00269•AKF, Inc. v. Haven Transportation Business Solutions, Inc. et al
AKF, Inc. v. Haven Transportation Business Solutions, Inc. et al
1:22-cv-00269NyndMay 27, 2026
Full text
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------- X AFK, Inc., Plaintiff, Case No. 26-01001-1-pgr (Misc.) v. 22-cv-00269 MAD-PJE Haven Transportation Business Solutions, Inc., Defendant. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X ORDER DETERMINING THAT HAVEN’S DEBTS WERE NOT DISCHARGED WHEREAS, this matter was referred to this Court by Order of the Honorable Mae A. D’Agostino on May 19, 2026, for a determination as to whether the claim(s) of Plaintiff AFK, Inc. (“AKF”) against Defendant Haven Transportation Business Solutions, Inc. (“Haven”) have been discharged pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727; and Signed this 27 day of May, 2026. Patrick G. Radel _______________________________ United States Bankruptcy Judge So Ordered. Case 1:22-cv-00269-MAD-PJE Document 73 Filed 05/27/26 Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS, Anthony Havelka-Chibici and Kimberly Chibici filed a joint petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 7, 2023, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (Docket No. 1 in case number 1-23-11995-cjf); and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Chibici disclosed joint ownership of Haven as an asset in their bankruptcy case (Docket No. 1, in case number 1-23-11995-cjf, at p. 13); and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Chibici received a discharge of debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727 on April 8, 2024 (Docket No. 35, in case number 1-23-11995-cjf); and WHEREAS, bankruptcy discharges granted to corporate principals/owners do not discharge obligations owed by and/or claims against a corporate entity, see In re Goodman, 873 F.2d 598, 602 (2d Cir. 1989)( “Goodman's Chapter 7 liquidation discharged all of his personal, pre-petition obligations, but did not discharge the corporate debt of EG (of which he was the sole shareholder) and GPP (his wife’s new company)”); and NOW, THEREFORE, this Court finds that the discharge granted to Mr. and Mrs. Chibici did not discharge any claims against and/or obligations of Haven, including, but not necessarily limited to, any claim(s) held by AKF. ### Case 1:22-cv-00269-MAD-PJE Document 73 Filed 05/27/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.