Schuster v. The United States

2:26-cv-01759NmdJun 3, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
TERESA SCHUSTER,
Plaintiff,
v. No. 2:26-cv-01759-GJF1
UNITED STATES,
Defendant
ORDER FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
NOTICE REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT
Pro se Plaintiff asserts a claim against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims
Act. See Complaint for a Civil Case, Doc. 1, filed June 1, 2026.
The Court has identified the following deficiency in the Complaint and orders Plaintiff to
file an amended complaint. See Lowrey v. Sandoval County Children Youth and Families
Department, 2023WL4560223 *2 (10th Cir. July 17, 2023) (stating: “Given a referral for non-
dispositive pretrial matters, a magistrate judge may point out deficiencies in the complaint [and]
order a litigant to show cause”) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)).
Plaintiff attached to the Complaint an eight-page, single-spaced Statement of Claims
alleging facts in support of her claim. See Complaint at 6-13. The allegations in the Statement of
1 The Clerk's Office assigned the undersigned to this case for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915
which allows the Court to authorize commencement of a case without prepayment of the filing fee.
See Doc. 2, filed June 1, 2026. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. See Doc. 3, filed June 1, 2026.
The undersigned has reviewed the Complaint pursuant to the Court's inherent power to manage its
docket. See Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Management Solutions, Inc., 824 Fed.Appx. 550,
553 (10th Cir. 2020) ("a district court has the inherent power 'to manage [its] own affairs so as to
achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases'”) (quoting Dietz v. Bouldin, 136 S. Ct.
1885, 1891-92 (2016)).
Case 2:26-cv-01759-MLG-GJF Document 4 Filed 06/03/26 Page 1 of 4
2
Claims are not numbered. Defendant must admit or deny each allegation asserted by Plaintiff. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(1)(B) (“In responding to a pleading, a party must . . . admit or deny the
allegations asserted against it by an opposing party”). For Defendant to clearly identify which
allegations it admits or denies, Plaintiff must number the allegations in the amended complaint.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b) (“A party must state its claims or defenses in numbered paragraphs”);
D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1 (“Except for footnotes and quotations, the text of all documents must be
double spaced”).
Case Management
Generally, pro se litigants are held to the same standards of professional
responsibility as trained attorneys. It is a pro se litigant’s responsibility to become
familiar with and to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local
Rules of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (the “Local
Rules”).
Guide for Pro Se Litigants at 4, United States District Court, District of New Mexico (October
2022). The Local Rules, the Guide for Pro Se Litigants and a link to the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure are available on the Court’s website: http://www.nmd.uscourts.gov.
Plaintiff has an obligation to prosecute this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff
fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss
the action”); Gustafson v. Luke, 696 Fed.Appx. 352, 354 (10th Cir. 2017) (“Although the language
of Rule 41(b) requires that the defendant file a motion to dismiss, the Rule has long been
interpreted to permit courts to dismiss actions sua sponte for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or
comply with the rules of civil procedure or court's orders.”) (quoting Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d
1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)).
Plaintiff also has an obligation to serve Defendant with a summons and a copy of the
amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1) (“The plaintiff is responsible for having the
Case 2:26-cv-01759-MLG-GJF Document 4 Filed 06/03/26 Page 2 of 4
3
summons and complaint served within the time allowed by Rule 4(m) and must furnish the
necessary copies to the person who makes service”).
Compliance with Rule 11
The Court reminds Plaintiff of her obligations pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. See Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d 925, 927 n. 1 (10th Cir. 2008) (“Pro se status
does not excuse the obligation of any litigant to comply with the fundamental requirements of the
Federal Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure.”). Rule 11(b) provides:
Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written
motion, or other paper--whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating
it--an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person's
knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the
circumstances:
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause
unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law
or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law
or for establishing new law;
(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified,
will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further
investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if
specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 11 may subject Plaintiff to
sanctions, including monetary penalties and nonmonetary directives. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c).
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, within 21 days of entry of this Order, file an amended
complaint. The amended complaint must comply with the Federal and Local Rules of Civil
Procedure. Failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this case.
Case 2:26-cv-01759-MLG-GJF Document 4 Filed 06/03/26 Page 3 of 4
4
SO ORDERED.
_________________________________________
THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 2:26-cv-01759-MLG-GJF Document 4 Filed 06/03/26 Page 4 of 4

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.