Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
NAN LIN,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 1:26-cv-01216-MIS-JFR
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
TODD M. LYONS; Acting Director of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement;
DAVID EASTERWOOD, Field Office
Director of Enforcement and Removal
Operations, Minneapolis-St. Paul Field
Office, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement; MARY DE ANDA-YBARRA,
Field Office Director of Enforcement and
Removal Operations, El Paso Field Office,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and
WARDEN, Otero County Processing Center,
Respondents,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ENJOINING TRANSFER
This matter is before the Court on the Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas (“Petition”),
filed by Nan Lin on March 23, 2026. ECF No. 2. Petitioner is an immigration detainee at the Otero
County Detention Center. Petitioner’s Reply at 2, ECF No. 9. Petitioner is a citizen of China who
entered the United States on or about December 3, 2023. See Pet. ¶ 33, ECF No. 2. Petitioner filed
an application for asylum and received a valid work permit. Id. ¶¶ 34-35. He has not missed an
immigration court hearing and does not have a criminal history in the United States or elsewhere.
Id. ¶ 35. Petitioner was detained on December 19, 2025. Id. ¶ 36. Petitioner is being held under
8 U.S.C. § 1225(b). Id. ¶ 29. Petitioner was initially detained in Minnesota before being transferred
to the Otero County Processing Center in New Mexico where he remains in detention. Id. ¶ 38.
This case was initially filed in Minnesota before being transferred to the District of New Mexico.
Case 1:26-cv-01216-MIS-JFR Document 14 Filed 04/20/26 Page 1 of 3

2
ECF Nos. 10-12.
Petitioner seeks an order for immediate release and an order from the District of Minnesota
Court requiring transfer back to Minnesota and prohibiting transfer out of Minnesota. Pet. at 22,
ECF No. 2. As the transfer issue has been fully briefed and decided, see ECF Nos. 6, 7, 9-11, the
Court interprets the latter as a request for an order ensuring the Court retains jurisdiction; in this
case an order to enjoin transfer out of the District of New Mexico.
Having reviewed the record, the Petition may raise a colorable claim for relief. The Clerk’s
Office served Respondents with the Petition and added them as notice-recipients via CM/ECF,
pursuant to this District’s Standing Order Regarding Service of Process in Immigration Habeas
Petitions filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Case 1:26-mc-00004, ECF No. 2 (D.N.M. Jan. 28,
2026). ECF No. 13.
Within ten (10) business days of entry of this Order, the United States Attorney’s Office
(“USAO”) shall respond to the Petition and show cause why the requested relief should not be
granted. The USAO’s answer MUST specify whether the Court has already ruled on the legal
issue(s) in this case and, if so, whether the facts are distinguishable from prior rulings. See, e.g.,
Lopez-Romero v. Lyons, Case No. 2:25-cv-0113-MIS-JHR, 2026 WL 92873 (D.N.M. Jan. 13,
2026) (finding that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) governed the petitioner’s detention and that his continued
detention violated his Fifth Amendment due process rights); Khan v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Homeland
Sec., Case No. 2:26-cv-00315-MIS-GJF, 2026 WL 776190 (D.N.M. Mar. 19, 2026) (granting
habeas relief to petitioner where the presumptively reasonable six-month-period of confinement
had expired and the respondents failed to rebut the petitioner’s showing that there was good reason
to believe that there was no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable
future). If the federal Respondents fail to timely comply with this Order, the Court may grant
the relief requested in the Petition without further notice.
Case 1:26-cv-01216-MIS-JFR Document 14 Filed 04/20/26 Page 2 of 3

3
If Petitioner wishes to file a reply brief, he may do so within ten (10) days after
Respondents’ response is filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to preserve the status quo in the interim, Respondents
are ENJOINED from transferring Petitioner to any facility outside the District of New Mexico
and/or from removing him from the United States during the pendency of this habeas action, absent
a final order of removal.
………………………………………….
MARGARET STRICKLAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:26-cv-01216-MIS-JFR Document 14 Filed 04/20/26 Page 3 of 3