Romero-Valdez v. Parnall Law Firm, LLC

1:23-cv-01084NmdFeb 23, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
____________________
DOMINIQUE ROMERO-VALDEZ,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v. Case No. 1:23-cv-01084-LF-GJF
PARNALL LAW FIRM, LLC,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS FOR DIRECTED VERDICT
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Parnall Law Firm, LLC’s (“Parnall
Law”) three motions for directed verdict: Documents 249, 256, and 257. Based on the jury’s
verdict and the parties’ discussion at the status conference on February 19, 2026 (Doc. 268), the
Court denies these three motions as moot without prejudice. Defendant may refile these motions
if they become relevant later in the proceedings.
It is so ordered.
____________________________________
LAURA FASHING
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 1:23-cv-01084-LF-GJF Document 270 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.