Waite v. Burke

1:26-cv-00112NhdSep 22, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Richard A. Waite
v.
Captain FNU Burke et al.
Case No. 26-cv-112-LM-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated August
20, 2026. 	“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.”
Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023)
(quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564
(1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d
163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to
appellate review.”).
Mr. Waite’s request for preliminary injunctive relief (docs. 2
and 7) is denied as moot, without prejudice to his ability to seek
similar relief in the future should circumstances so warrant.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: September 22, 2026
cc: Richard A. Waite, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:26-cv-00112-LM-TSM Document 35 Filed 09/22/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.