Tucker v. Mcclanahan

1:26-cv-00073NhdMay 8, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mia Tucker
v.
Kevin McClanahan
Case No. 26-cv-73-SE
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated
February 4, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, this case is
dismissed. The clerk shall enter judgment close this case. “‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union
No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271,
275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to
appeal).
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
Chief Judge
Date: May 8, 2026
cc: Mia Tucker, pro se
Case 1:26-cv-00073-SE-TSM Document 5 Filed 05/08/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.