Fortune v. NH Department of Safety et al

1:25-cv-00377NhdAug 5, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
William E. Fortune
v.
NH Department of Safety et al
Case No. 25-cv-377-SM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated July
14, 2026, for the reasons set forth therein. Defendant’s Motion to
Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. “[O]nly those issues
fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.” 	Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line,
Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v.
United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also
Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016)
(“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”).
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: August 5, 2026
cc: 	William E. Fortune, pro se
Case 1:25-cv-00377-SM-TSM Document 41 Filed 08/05/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.