Waite v. Hoyt et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Richard A. Waite
v.
Dana Hoyt, et al
Case No. 22-cv-71-SE-AJ
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February
24, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, Waite’s motion for
emergency relief (Doc. No. 71), is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union
No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271,
275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to
appeal).
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
Chief Judge
Date: March 25, 2026
cc: Richard A. Waite, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:22-cv-00071-SE-AJ Document 111 Filed 03/25/26 Page 1 of 1