Strahan v. OReilly et al

1:22-cv-00052NhdMar 14, 2022

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Richard Maximus Strahan
v.
O’Reilly et al
Case No. 22-cv-52-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February
16, 2022 . 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
Date: March 14, 2022
cc: 	Richard Maximus Strahan, pro se
Case 1:22-cv-00052-SM Document 18 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.