Gomez v.FCI Berlin, Warden

1:21-cv-00771NhdFeb 17, 2022

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sandy Gomez
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 21-cv-771-PB
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated December 7, 2021, and dismiss this action, without prejudice,
for failure to timely pay the filing fee or obtain IFP status.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Paul J. Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: February 17, 2022
cc: Sandy Gomez, pro se
/s/Paul Barbadoro
Case 1:21-cv-00771-PB Document 7 Filed 02/17/22 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.