Hart v. Rowe et al

1:20-cv-00417NhdFeb 2, 2021

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Kenneth Hannibal Hart, Sr.
v.
Irene Brown Hart Rowe, et al.
Case No. 20-cv-417-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated January 8, 2021. Plaintiff's Motion to Remove
Multiple Defendants (doc no. 7)is granted and preliminary review
of the Complaint (1), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915, shall
continue only with the following defendants: Irene Brown Hart
Rowe; Kenneth Leon Hart; John Doe Bank, Hawthorne, FL; Jane Doe
bank teller, Hawthorne, FL; John Doe identity theft fraud
impersonator, Hawthorne, FL. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised
by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to
review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
Case 1:20-cv-00417-LM Document 9 Filed 02/02/21 Page 1 of 2
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
Date: February 2, 2021
cc: Kenneth Hannibal Hart, Sr., pro se
Case 1:20-cv-00417-LM Document 9 Filed 02/02/21 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.