Mullen v. Kissell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Martha Mullen
v.
Edward J. Kissell, Jr.
Case No. 20-cv-00347-PB
AMENDED ORDER
Having construed the plaintiff’s Motion for Extension (doc.
no. 3), and Motion for Contempt (doc. no. 4) as objections to
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and after due
consideration of the objections filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated March 26, 2020 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________	Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: April 13, 2020
cc: Martha Mullen, pro se
Case 1:20-cv-00347-PB Document 7 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 1