Lisasuain v. Mattis et al

1:19-cv-00593NhdMar 10, 2021

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Armando Lisasuain
v.
Paula Mattis, et al.
Case No. 19-cv-593-PB
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated February 11, 2021, and dismiss the claims
identified in the R&R as Claims 2(a), 2(b), 3(a), and 3(b), for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
defendants Paula Mattis, Debra Robinson, and Daryl Bazydlo are
dropped as parties. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the
objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in
the district court and those not preserved by such objection are
precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins.
Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v.
Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st
Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d
4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
/s/Paul Barbadoro___________
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: March 10, 2021
cc: Armando Lisasuain pro se
Case 1:19-cv-00593-PB Document 13 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.