Young v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:19-cv-00527NhdNov 14, 2019

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Lee Young
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 19-cv-527-SM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated October 21, 2019, for the reasons set forth
therein. 	Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is granted. “‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: November 14, 2019
cc: 	Lee Young, pro se
Seth R. Aframe, AUSA
Case 1:19-cv-00527-SM Document 12 Filed 11/14/19 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.