Sullivan v. NH Governor et al

1:17-cv-00444NhdOct 18, 2018

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Michael K. Sullivan
v.
N.H. Governor, et al.
Case Civil No. 17-cv-444-LM
O R D E R
Following the issuance of the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 3, 2018
(“R&R”), Sullivan filed document numbers 7 and 8, each captioned
as an “amended complaint.” The court has reviewed document
numbers 7 and 8 to determine if they impact in any way the
result in the R&R, could be construed as objections to the R&R,
or are otherwise deserving of further consideration. They are
not.
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the R&R.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
Case 1:17-cv-00444-LM Document 9 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2
2
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: October 18, 2018
cc: Michael K. Sullivan, pro se
Case 1:17-cv-00444-LM Document 9 Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.