Mottram et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

1:16-cv-00546NhdMar 28, 2017

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Stacey Mottram, et al
v.
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Civil No. 16-cv-546-PB
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated March 10, 2017. The plaintiffs’ request for a
preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Hon. Paul Barbadoro
United States District Court
Date: March 28, 2017
cc: Stacey Mottram, pro se
Darrin M. Mottram, pro se
Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Esq.
Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.