1:16-cv-00546•Mottram et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Stacey Mottram, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA Civil No. 16-cv-546-PB O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 10, 2017. The plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Hon. Paul Barbadoro United States District Court Date: March 28, 2017 cc: Stacey Mottram, pro se Darrin M. Mottram, pro se Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Esq. Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.