Rumph v. Rumph et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Stephen Rumph
v.
William Rumph, Sr., et al
Civil No. 16-cv-78-PB
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated February 24, 2017. The motion to intervene
(Doc. No. 67) is denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by
the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review
in the district court and those not preserved by such objection
are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l
Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v.
Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st
Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d
4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
Case 1:16-cv-00078-PB Document 80 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 2

specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to
appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Court
Date: March 15, 2017
cc: Stephen Rumph, pro se
Ralph Suozzo, Esq.
David A. Horan, Esq.
Linda M. Smith, Esq.
William N. Smart, Esq.
Case 1:16-cv-00078-PB Document 80 Filed 03/15/17 Page 2 of 2