Hart v. US Department of the Treasury et al

1:14-cv-00421NhdFeb 18, 2015

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Kenneth H. Hart
v.
US Department of the Treasury, et al
Civil No. 14-cv-421-LM
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation dated November 19, 2014, and the Order granting in
part and denying in part the Motion to Reconsider the Report and
Recommendation dated January 26, 2015, by Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v.
Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Case 1:14-cv-00421-LM Document 15 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 2
Date: February 18, 2015
cc: Kenneth H. Hart, pro se
Case 1:14-cv-00421-LM Document 15 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.