1:14-cv-00160•Widi, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE David J. Widi, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al. Case No. 14-cv-160-SM O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 8, 2014, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Plaintiff’s Privacy Act claim (Claim 1), and the Fifth Amendment and FTCA malicious prosecution/abuse of process claims (Claim 14 in the Amended Complaint (doc.no. 21), are hereby dismissed. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the original complaint Case 1:14-cv-00160-SM Document 62 Filed 02/20/15 Page 1 of 2
(doc. no. 20), is denied as moot. SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: February 20, 2015 cc: David J. Widi, Jr. pro se T. David Plourde, AUSA Case 1:14-cv-00160-SM Document 62 Filed 02/20/15 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.