USA v. Ness

8:25-mj-00637NedNov 21, 2025

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
vs.
CHRISTOPHER LEE NESS
Defendant.
8:25MJ637
1:24CR211
Magistrate Judge Carson
RULE 5 ORDER
A Petition for Action on Conditions of Pretrial Release having been filed in the District of
North Dakota, charging the above-named defendant with alleged violation of conditions of
release and the defendant having been arrested in the District of Nebraska, proceedings to
commit defendant to another district were held in accordance with Fed.R.Cr.P. Rule 5. 	The
defendant had an initial appearance here in accordance with Fed.R.Cr.P.5 and was informed of
the provisions of Fed.R.Cr.P.20.
Additionally, defendant
☒ 	Waived an identity hearing and admitted that he was the person named in the
aforementioned petition.
☒ 	Knowingly and voluntarily waived a preliminary and detention hearing in this district
and reserved his right to a preliminary and detention hearing in the charging district.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the defendant is held to answer in the prosecuting district.
☒ 	Defendant has been unable to obtain release under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18
U.S.C. § 3141 et.seq. and the U.S. Marshal is commanded to take custody of the
above named defendant and to transport the defendant with a certified copy of this
order forthwith to the prosecuting district specified above and there deliver the
defendant to the U.S. Marshal for that district or to some other officer authorized to
receive 	the 	defendant, 	all 	proceedings 	required 	by 	Fed.R.Cr.P.40 	having 	been
completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 21, 2025.
s/ Ryan C. Carson
U.S. Magistrate Judge
8:25-mj-00637-MDN Doc # 9 Filed: 11/21/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # <pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.