USA v. Rutherford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
vs.
NEAL LASALLE RUTHERFORD
Defendant.
4:25MJ3245
20CR20018
Magistrate Judge DeLuca
RULE 32.1 ORDER
A Petition and Warrant (charging document) having been filed in the district court for the
Eastern District of Michigan charging the above-named defendant with alleged violation of
supervised release, and the defendant having been arrested in the District of Nebraska,
proceedings to commit defendant to another district were held in accordance with Fed.R.Cr.P.
Rule 32.1. The defendant had an initial appearance here in accordance with Fed.R.Cr.P.32.1.
Additionally,
☒ 	The defendant waived an identity hearing and admitted that he/she was the person
named in the aforementioned charging document.
☒ 	The defendant waived his right to a preliminary examination.
☒ 	The government did move for detention.
☒ 	The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived a detention hearing in this district and
reserved his/her right to a detention hearing in the charging district.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the defendant is held to answer in the prosecuting district.
☒ 	Defendant has been unable to obtain release under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18
U.S.C. § 3141 et.seq. and the U.S. Marshal is commanded to take custody of the
above named defendant and to transport the defendant with a certified copy of this
order forthwith to the prosecuting district specified above and there deliver the
defendant to the U.S. Marshal for that district or to some other officer authorized to
receive the defendant, all proceedings required by Fed.R.Cr.P.40 having been
completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 29, 2025.
s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
U.S. Magistrate Judge
4:25-mj-03245-JMD Doc # 9 Filed: 10/29/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # <pageID>