USA v. Segura et al

1:18-cr-00034NddJun 1, 2018

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
United States of America, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON
) 	DETAINERS ORDER
vs. 	)
) 	Case No.: 1:18-cr-034
Jeremy Kaul, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
On June 1, 2018, defendant made his initial appearance and was arraigned in the above-
entitled action. SAUSA Dawn Deitz appeared on the Government’s behalf. Attorney Thomas Glass
was appointed to represent defendant in ths matter and appeared on defendant’s behalf.
Prior to his initial appearance, defendant was incarcerated by the State of North Dakota at
the North Dakota State Penitentiary (“NDSP”) in Bismarck, North Dakota. After the Superseding
Indictment in this case was returned and an arrest warrant issued, a detainer was filed by the United
States with the North Dakota prison officials. Pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act
(“IADA”), defendant’s appearance before this court for his initial appearance and arraignment was
secured by a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum.
At his initial appearance and arraignment, defendant was advised of his rights under the
IADA to continued federal custody until the charges set forth in the Indictment are adjudicated.
Thereafter, defendant waived the anti-shuttling provisions of the IADA and requested to be returned
to state custody.
Based on defendant’s waiver, the court finds that knowingly, voluntarily, and upon advice
of counsel waived the anti-shuttling provisions of the IADA and in open court and agreed to return
1
Case 1:18-cr-00034-DLH Document 151 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 2
to the custody of the State of North Dakota (the “sending state” under the IADA) at the NDSP
pending further proceedings in this case initiated by the United States (the “receiving state” under
the IADA)..
Accordingly, the court ORDERS that defendant be housed in the “sending state” under the
IADA pending further proceedings or until further order of the court. 	Further, pursuant to
defendant’s waiver, the return of the defendant to his place of incarceration pending trial shall not
be grounds under the IADA for dismissal of the charges set forth in the Indictment.
Dated this 1st day of June, 2018.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:18-cr-00034-DLH Document 151 Filed 06/01/18 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.