Freeman v. Rost et al

1:17-cv-00214NddSep 18, 2018

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Bruce Freeman, 	)
) 	ORDER TO FILE DISCOVERY
Plaintiff, 	) 	MOTION
)
vs. 	)
) 	Case No.: 1:17-cv-214
Amanda Rost et al, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
Defendants have fulfilled their obligation to contact the court to request a telephonic
conference pursuant to D.N.D. Civ. L.R. 37.1 regarding their discovery dispute with Mr. Freeman.
Given Mr. Freeman’s current incarceration the court does not require a telephonic conference on this
issue and Defendants obligation under D.N.D. Civ. L.R. 37.(A) is deemed fulfilled. Defendants can
proceed with filing their discovery motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 18th day of September, 2018.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Case 1:17-cv-00214-DLH-CSM Document 45 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.