1:17-cv-00165•Peterson v. Murex Petroleum Corporation et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Adam Peterson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE vs. ) WITH LOCAL RULE RE FILING OF ) DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS Murex Petroleum Corporation, ) Mickey Peck, company man, ) Stokes and Spiehler, ) Stokes and Spiehler Onshore, Inc., ) Earl Britzenhoff, Company Man, and ) Phoenix Operating Company, ) Case No.1:17-cv-165 ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) Murex Petroleum Corporation, ) ) Defendant and ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WISCO, Inc., ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) One or more of the parties have filed excerpts of deposition transcripts in support of their motions. This is in contravention of the court’s local rule D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 7.1(D)(1), which requires that copies of the complete transcripts be filed electronically in PDF format. The party or parties that have filed only excerpts must file complete copies within 2 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply may result in any motions for which the excerpts have been provided in support being summarily denied. 1 Case 1:17-cv-00165-CSM Document 118 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 2
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 25th day of March, 2019. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2 Case 1:17-cv-00165-CSM Document 118 Filed 03/25/19 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.