USA v. Divers et al

1:15-cr-00185NddJan 6, 2017

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
United States of America, )
)
Plaintiff, ) ORDER
)
vs. )
) Case No. 1-15-cr-185
Donald Lee Divers, )
)
Defendant. )
Before the court is the Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider Order of Detention. (Docket No.
110). In the motion, the Defendant moves the court to reconsider its prior order detaining the
Defendant until trial. (Docket No. 106). The United States opposes the Motion. (Docket No. 113).
After consideration, the court is not prepared to release the Defendant on any set of
conditions. As stated in the court’s prior order, there is a presumption of detention in the
Defendant’s case. Likewise, the weight of the evidence presented by the United States remains
strong. The Defendant has not provided any evidence militating against these factors. Moreover,
the Defendant has not provided the court with any other information indicating the Defendant’s
circumstances have changed so as to reduce his risk of flight or risk to the community. While the
court can appreciate the Defendant has been in jail for almost a year, and no trial date has yet been
set because of an absent co-defendant, the Defendant may move the court to sever his case if he
wants a more immediate trial. Based on the foregoing, the Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider Order
of Detention, (Docket No. 110), is DENIED.
Case 1:15-cr-00185-DLH Document 115 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 6th day of January, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:15-cr-00185-DLH Document 115 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.