USA v. Villarreal et al

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Western District of North Carolina
United States of America
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
Raymundo Villarreal
Case No: 5:18-cr-48-KDB-SCR-16
USM No: 34479-058
Date of Original Judgment: 10/16/2019
Date of Previous Amended Judgment:
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 10/16/2019 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge’s signature
Effective Date: Kenneth D. Bell
(if different from order date) Printed name and title
Signed: February 26, 2024
Case 5:18-cr-00048-KDB-SCR Document 455 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 2

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 2 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)
This page contains information that should not be filed in court unless under seal.
(Not for Public Disclosure)
Raymundo Villarreal	DEFENDANT:
CASE NUMBER: 5:18-cr-48-KDB-SCR-16
DISTRICT: Western District of North Carolina
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Total Offense Level: Amended Total Offense Level:
Criminal History Category: Criminal History Category:
Previous Guideline Range: to months Amended Guideline Range: to months
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO THE AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the
time of sentencing as a result of a substantial assistance departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence
is comparably less than the amended guideline range.
The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range.
III. FACTORS CONSIDERED UNDER USSG § 1B1.10 AND 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (See Chavez-Meza v. United
States, 138 S.Ct. 1959 (2018))
Under the amendment to U.S.S.G. §4C1.1 in Amendment 821, the Defendant does not qualify to receive a two-level reduction
in his offense level as a zero-point offender because he does not satisfy §4C1.1(a)(7) because he possessed a firearm. (Doc. No.
294, ¶¶ 17, 25).
Case 5:18-cr-00048-KDB-SCR Document 455 Filed 02/26/24 Page 2 of 2