5:05-cr-00009•USA v. Eckles et al
Full text
The Letter was received by the Court on September 1, 2005.1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION NO: 5:05CR9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) ANTHONY MICHAEL BROWN, ) Defendant. ) ) _________________________________________ ) THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT upon the receipt of a letter from Anthony Michael Brown, dated August 29, 2005 (the “Letter”). In the Letter, Mr. Brown seeks to withdraw1 his plea agreement. The record reflects that Mr. Brown is represented by appointed counsel, R. Locke Bell. It is the practice of this Court, when a defendant is represented by counsel, to rule on motions filed only by counsel of record. Therefore, if Mr. Brown has any matters he wishes this Court to consider, they must be submitted through his attorney. The Court notes Mr. Brown’s contentions that Mr. Bell failed to inform him of certain things. As such, the Court will schedule an inquiry into the status of counsel. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Mr. Brown’s request is DENIED without prejudice to Mr. Brown’s right to re-file the motions, if appropriate, through his attorney. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of the Letter to Mr. Bell along with his copy of this Order. Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 326 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
Signed: September 6, 2005 Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 326 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION NO: 5:05CR9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff VS. ORDER ANTHONY MICHAEL BROWN, Defendant. a a THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT upon the receipt of a letter from Anthony Michael Brown, dated August 29, 2005 (the “Letter”).' In the Letter, Mr. Brown seeks to withdraw his plea agreement. The record reflects that Mr. Brown is represented by appointed counsel, R. Locke Bell. It is the practice of this Court, when a defendant is represented by counsel, to rule on motions filed only by counsel of record. Therefore, if Mr. Brown has any matters he wishes this Court to consider, they must be submitted through his attorney. The Court notes Mr. Brown’s contentions that Mr. Bell failed to inform him of certain things. As such, the Court will schedule an inquiry into the status of counsel. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Mr. Brown’s request is DENIED without prejudice to Mr. Brown’s right to re-file the motions, if appropriate, through his attorney. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of the Letter to Mr. Bell along with his copy of this Order. ' The Letter was received by the Court on September 1, 2005. INFORMATION GPO pe 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 326 Filed 09/09/05 Page1of2 Signed: September 6, 2005 Dac David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge Case 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 326 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.