5:05-cr-00009•USA v. Eckles et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION NO: 5:05CR9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) CORTNEY SIRRON PFIFER, ) Defendant. ) ) ___________________________________ ) THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of Defendant Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276), filed August 1, 2005 by the United States with respect to Cortney Sirron Pfifer. In the Motion, the United States asks the Court to conduct a hearing prior to the commencement of trial and/or change of plea in order to assure that Mr. Pfifer is aware of allegations against his attorney of record, Kenneth Darty, and his right to representation by conflict-free counsel. Because the Court has already scheduled an inquiry into the status of counsel for August 11, 2005 at 9:30 A.M. in front of the Honorable Carl Horn, III, the undersigned will deny the Motion as moot. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of Defendant Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 289 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2
Signed: August 8, 2005 Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 289 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION NO: 5:05CR9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) CORTNEY SIRRON PFIFER, ) Defendant. ) ) ) THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of Defendant Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276), filed August 1, 2005 by the United States with respect to Cortney Sirron Pfifer. In the Motion, the United States asks the Court to conduct a hearing prior to the commencement of trial and/or change of plea in order to assure that Mr. Pfifer is aware of allegations against his attorney of record, Kenneth Darty, and his right to representation by conflict-free counsel. Because the Court has already scheduled an inquiry into the status of counsel for August 11, 2005 at 9:30 A.M. in front of the Honorable Carl Horn, II, the undersigned will deny the Motion as moot. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of Defendant Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. INFORMATION GPO pe 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 289 _ Filed 08/09/05 Page1of2 Signed: August 8, 2005 Dac David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge Case 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 289 _ Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.