USA v. Eckles et al

5:05-cr-00009NcwdAug 9, 2005

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
NO: 5:05CR9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff )
)
vs. ) ORDER
)
CORTNEY SIRRON PFIFER, )
Defendant. )
)
___________________________________ )
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of
Defendant Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276), filed August
1, 2005 by the United States with respect to Cortney Sirron Pfifer. In the Motion, the United States
asks the Court to conduct a hearing prior to the commencement of trial and/or change of plea in order
to assure that Mr. Pfifer is aware of allegations against his attorney of record, Kenneth Darty, and
his right to representation by conflict-free counsel. Because the Court has already scheduled an
inquiry into the status of counsel for August 11, 2005 at 9:30 A.M. in front of the Honorable
Carl Horn, III, the undersigned will deny the Motion as moot.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of Defendant
Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276) is hereby DENIED AS
MOOT.
Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 289 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2
Signed: August 8, 2005
Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 289 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION
NO: 5:05CR9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff )
)

vs. ) ORDER
)
CORTNEY SIRRON PFIFER, )
Defendant. )
)
)

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of
Defendant Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276), filed August
1, 2005 by the United States with respect to Cortney Sirron Pfifer. In the Motion, the United States
asks the Court to conduct a hearing prior to the commencement of trial and/or change of plea in order
to assure that Mr. Pfifer is aware of allegations against his attorney of record, Kenneth Darty, and
his right to representation by conflict-free counsel. Because the Court has already scheduled an
inquiry into the status of counsel for August 11, 2005 at 9:30 A.M. in front of the Honorable
Carl Horn, II, the undersigned will deny the Motion as moot.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Motion to Conduct Inquiry of Defendant
Regarding Defense Counsel’s Conflict of Interest ...” (Document No. 276) is hereby DENIED AS

MOOT.

INFORMATION
GPO

pe 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 289 _ Filed 08/09/05 Page1of2

Signed: August 8, 2005

Dac

David C. Keesler
United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 289 _ Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.