Mountain Island Day Community Charter School et al v. Inspire Performing Arts Company, LLC et al

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-00779-FDW-DCK
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, (Doc. No. 2). After careful consideration, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order is DENIED. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
until after a hearing on the Motion.
Plaintiffs allege Defendants Lewis and May, two former employees of Plaintiffs now
working for their own dance company, Defendant Inspire Performing Arts Company (“Inspire
PAC”), have breached the non-solicitation provisions of their employment agreements by
“soliciting parents of students participating with the Inspire Dance Team to join Inspire PAC.”
(Doc. No. 2-1, p. 2.) Plaintiffs further allege Inspire Pac infringed Plaintiffs’ trademarks by
“promot[ing] its business on its website and on social media using photographs, videos, and other
information of the Inspire Dance Team.” (Id.) Plaintiffs argue a temporary restraining order and
preliminary injunction are necessary to prevent Defendants from causing irreparable harm to
MARINER FOUNDATION,
MOUNTAIN ISLAND DAY COMMUNITY
CHARTER SCHOOL,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) ORDER
)
LISA LEWIS,
MEGAN ZUGELDER MAY,
INSPIRE PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY,
LLC,
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants. )
)
Case 3:24-cv-00779-KDB-DCK Document 4 Filed 08/28/24 Page 1 of 2

2
Plaintiffs during the pendency of this action. (Id. at 19–20.) Specifically, Plaintiffs allege in recent
weeks “Inspire Dance Team has lost virtually all of its student participants and adult staff to Inspire
PAC,” which will result in “loss of good will and loss of existing and potential customers” if it
continues. (Id. at 20.) While Plaintiffs’ argument is not without merit, the Court finds that a
temporary restraining order is not appropriate at this time. The Court will instead hear argument
only on the preliminary injunction.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining
Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED IN PART without prejudice, to
the extent it seeks a temporary restraining order, and the Court DEFERS IN PART a ruling on
the Motion to the extent it seeks preliminary injunctive relief.
TAKE NOTICE that a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction shall
take place on Thursday, September 5, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom #5B of the Charles R. Jonas
Federal Building, 401 W. Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina. At the hearing, each side shall
have thirty (30) minutes for a brief presentation of critical evidence and argument. As Defendants
have not yet entered an appearance, Plaintiffs are directed to serve Defendants with a copy of this
Order, immediately.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: August 28, 2024
Case 3:24-cv-00779-KDB-DCK Document 4 Filed 08/28/24 Page 2 of 2