Faulkenberry v. Novant Health Inc.

3:23-cv-00163NcwdOct 12, 2023

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:23-cv-000163-RJC-DCK
EBONY JOI FAULKENBERRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Ebony Joi Faulkenberry’s Motion
for Default Judgment. (Doc. No. 4). Plaintiff filed this action on March 17, 2023, and filed the
instant motion on May 1, 2023, without moving for an entry of default. “Prior to obtaining a default
judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as provided
by Rule 55(a).” 10A Mary Kay Kane & Adam N. Steinman, Federal Practice and Procedure
(Wright & Miller) § 2682 (4th ed. Apr. 2023 update); accord AAA v. J & T Body Shop, Inc., No.
3:10-cv-00189-RJC-DCK, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126050, at *2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2011)
(Conrad, J.) (“In order to obtain a default judgment, a party must first seek an entry of default
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a).”). Plaintiff failed to seek an entry of default under
Rule 55(a) before moving for default judgment, and thus, her motion is “procedurally improper.”
See Heard v. Caruso, 351 F. App'x 1, 16 (6th Cir. 2009).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, (Doc.
No. 4), is DENIED.
Signed: October 11, 2023
Case 3:23-cv-00163-MEO-DCK Document 5 Filed 10/12/23 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.