USA v. Cloud et al

3:20-cr-00385NcwdFeb 28, 2024

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:20-CR-00385-RJC-DCK
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a
reduction of sentence based on Amendment 821 to the United States Sentencing
Guidelines relating to certain zero-point offenders. (Doc. No. 385).
Part B, Subpart 1 of the Amendment is retroactive and created a two-level
decrease if a defendant meets all the criteria in USSG §4C1.1(a). USSG §1B1.10(d),
comment. (n.7). Here, the defendant was assessed one criminal history point for
communicating threats in 2010. (Doc. No. 187: Presentence Report ¶ 43).
Accordingly, she is not eligible for relief. USSG § 4C1.1(a)(1).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant’s motion is DENIED.
USA )
)
v. ) ORDER
)
LATISHA ANDERSON (7) )
)
Signed: February 28, 2024
Case 3:20-cr-00385-MEO-DCK Document 387 Filed 02/28/24 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.