3:18-cr-00099•USA v. Farris
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK USA ) ) v. ) ORDER ) GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS ) ) THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the defendant’s pro se motion to reconsider, (Doc. No. 232), challenging the denial of his sentence reduction motion under Amendment 821, (Doc. No. 230: Order). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has ruled that neither the federal statutes nor the Rules of Criminal Procedure authorize a motion for reconsideration in a criminal case. United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 526, 530 (4th Cir. 1985) (“[D]efendant’s remedies are limited by the statutes and Federal Rules of Criminal and Appellate Procedure . . .”). Accordingly, a defendant must file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the entry of the order being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant’s motion, (Doc. No. 232), is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this Order to the defendant and the United States Attorney. Signed: January 25, 2024 Case 3:18-cr-00099-MOC-DCK Document 233 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.