3:18-cr-00099•USA v. Farris
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. After this Court denied, (Doc. No. 170: Order), the defendant’s amended Motion for New Trial, (Doc. No. 165), the defendant filed a Motion for Reconsideration, (Doc. No. 176), and a Motion to Amend the Motion for Reconsideration, (Doc. No. 182). The Court found no basis to alter its prior ruling. (Doc. No. 181).1 In a separate Order, (Doc. No. 186), the Court granted the Motion to Amend the Motion for Reconsideration. The defendant has now filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit stating the Order granting the Motion to Amend, (Doc. No. 186), was “issued without any instruction or clarity on the granting of the motion.” (Case No. 22-1961, Doc. No. 1 at 2). This Court’s intent was to permit the amendment of the Motion for Reconsideration, but not to alter its ruling on the merits. Accordingly, the amended Motion for New Trial and the amended Motion for Reconsideration are considered resolved in this Court. 1 The Motion to Amend was received on June 6, 2022, and entered on June 8, 2022. (Doc. No. 182). The Court’s Order denying the Motion for Reconsideration was entered on June 7, 2022. (Doc. No. 181). USA ) ) v. ) ORDER ) GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS ) ) Case 3:18-cr-00099-MOC-DCK Document 203 Filed 09/21/22 Page 1 of 2
2 The Clerk is directed to certify copies to the defendant, the United States Attorney, and the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Signed: September 21, 2022 Case 3:18-cr-00099-MOC-DCK Document 203 Filed 09/21/22 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.